<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collaborative Pre-Nuptial Agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collaborativedivorcenorthwest.com/2010/01/collaborative-pre-nuptial-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collaborativedivorcenorthwest.com/2010/01/collaborative-pre-nuptial-agreements/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Collaborative Divorce and Family Law from Stephens Margolin P.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kales</title>
		<link>http://www.collaborativedivorcenorthwest.com/2010/01/collaborative-pre-nuptial-agreements/comment-page-1/#comment-4699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collaborativedivorcenorthwest.com/?p=218#comment-4699</guid>
		<description>I find your concept appealing, but I would be a bit concerned the engaged couple might not truly get that you only represent one of them.  Why not bring the other attorney in from the beginning? It seems you get through the agreement after a handful of collaborative meetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find your concept appealing, but I would be a bit concerned the engaged couple might not truly get that you only represent one of them.  Why not bring the other attorney in from the beginning? It seems you get through the agreement after a handful of collaborative meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
